The thought of an Ebola Pandemic is scary because of the potential effects on the modern globalized economy. Kenya banned flights from Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia from entering into the country. Other airlines such as British Airways have also suspended flying to the affected countries.

The ban is bound to have an impact on the revenue that the government of Kenya collects. This article delves into the impact on taxes of the ban on flights from the affected countries into Kenya.

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="423"] The Black Death by Nicholas Poussin... Whereas the black plague killed 30% of Europe's population, Ebola has 2000 fatalities out of a one billion African population.[/caption]

The tax practice

There are two broad bilateral approaches to taxation of shipping lines and airlines in international traffic. In the first approach, profits from the operation of ships and aircraft in international traffic are taxable only in the Contracting State in which the place of effective management of the enterprise is situated. This is the approach favoured by the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development).

The second approach is recommended by the UN Model Tax Treaty to allow countries with undeveloped shipping industries to have a piece of the tax revenue pie. Profits from the operation of aircraft in international traffic are taxable only in the Contracting State in which the place of effective management of the enterprise is situated. However, the profits relating to the operation of ships in international traffic may be taxed at a reduced rate of tax in the second state if the operations in that second state are more than casual.

Most countries unilaterally tax ships and aircraft in international traffic. In the case of Kenya, the unilateral rate of tax is 2.5% of the gross revenue (ticket price) from cargo, mail and passenger traffic sourced in Kenya.

The tax revenue losers

In view of the above tax practices in international shipping and air transport, countries affected by Ebola as well as countries that have banned flights into/from the affected regions will suffer direct revenue loss.

Closer home, Kenya Airways (KQ) derives around 25% of its revenues from West Africa.  Out of the 44 weekly flights to West Africa before the ban, 7 were to the affected countries.  KQ made losses in the last two years (KShs 3B last year and KShs 7.8B in the preceding year) for reasons not related to the Ebola outbreak. The outbreak is likely to delay KQ’s return to profitability and tax contribution to the exchequer especially if the ban is extended over a long time or to other West African destinations.

[caption id="attachment_33512" align="aligncenter" width="413"] At a recent press conference, Titus Naikuni the outgoing KQ CEO mentioned that revenues from West Africa were not more than 25%[/caption]

Kenya Airports Authority (KAA) collects US $ 40 for every passenger who lands at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA).  In addition, KAA collects airplane landing fees. KAA will lose on revenues that would have been paid by the passengers and airplanes from the banned routes.

Korean Airlines of South Korea suspended operations from Kenya stating that as a regional hub, Kenya has a high risk of exposure to Ebola. Again, this ripple effect leads to loss of revenue for KAA.

The silver lining

The outbreak possibly gives the smaller regional aviation players a chance to grow their market share on the routes that have been shunned by the major airlines. Charter flights (“the taxis of the sky”) are also likely to gain more prominence in the transportation of key personnel and cargo to the affected areas.

This article was posted by East African Tax, for the full article click here.

A slight correction has been made on the article by inserting the second paragraph. "The ban is bound to have an impact on the revenue that..."